I have been struggling with depression today and that is hard enough. But how I dealt with it today wasn't in a positive day. I spent the day reading a lot of blogs, and unfortunately that isn't a good idea. I read a lot of blogs of medical bloggers and have come to the opinion that many of the doctors who blog feel that they are superior to their patients and so it is OK to judge them. Sometimes the judgmental attitude is blatant and in your face,
as in this blog. He is actually very funny and to tell the truth, the most hits I've ever gotten on this blog was when he used one of my posts when the hosted Grand Rounds. But it makes me wonder first, why he just doesn't find another profession and second, what are the attitudes that my own physicians are having about contact with me. Sometimes the attitudes are more subtle. These are the ones that I worry about, like in
this post. This is a guy that practices in the same city that I get treated in and after reading that post I wanted to just shake him. I know that he was just ranting and the post doesn't seem to address a single point, but many. I understand that. There are situations that bother you on many levels and for many reasons. I can understand that, I have been there often. If you didn't follow the link this post makes no sense, so it isn't worth reading. He is talking about a tear in his shoulder muscle that has been troubling him. In the beginning it seems that he is discussing his ability to self refer and his contempt for reaching your out of pocket, so you decide to use the system to receive necessary medical attention. Yes, people are more willing to use their benefits if they have already reached their out-of-pocket. That is a natural reaction and I don't know anyone from the CEO of the Fortune 500 company that I work at down who doesn't do this. We aren't scamming the system. We have met our part of the agreement and now are using our benefits. At the company that I work at, we are told that this is part of our total compensation package. In other words, how I get paid for the work that I do. I am not scamming the company that I work for, the hospital that I'm at or the insurance company who covers me. This is and agreed upon contract.
But then he takes a different turn and one that I could almost applaud. He derides the nurses' instance that he should see the NP instead of the Surgeon that he came to see. Look, I understand that an NP is OK to write a prescription, treat strep throat or perform a pap smear. Regular routine medical care is what they should be monitoring. But when there is a known problem, I want the expert that went to medical school. I don't want the practitioner with in house training. So when the NP sees me at my diet check up or looks at my normal blood work and tells me that my kidneys are working fine, I'm fine. But I don't want to see them at my oncologists office and it offends me that they think that's OK. I see both the NP and the EP at my cardiology appointments so I don't mind so much seeing both of them, but I'd be pissed if I thought both of them weren't perusing my ekg. But his argument was as follows:
"
That might go over well with a public that accepts health care at face value, but it's not OK with me."
In other words, "Regular patients don't understand the difference in medical training, but I'm an insider and I do. Because I'm a doctor, I deserve better care." OK, he deserves the services of a surgeon because he is a doctor? Are you kidding me? I think I deserve to see the surgeon because I had stage 3 breast cancer and for the rest of my life, I am at a real risk that it will come back, or that I will produce a second primary cancer. Which argument would you think holds more value? I think that I need to see the EP because I have a finicky congenital heart condition that is so rare that most doctors who aren't EP's won't recognize on an EKG. If you were facing a choice of who gets to see the EP or the NP, who would you choose? It disturbs me that he thinks that he is better and more worthy of the surgeons attention because he is a doctor. And it also disturbs me that because the surgeon only sees him because he was willing to leave the office.
Then he goes on to a dissertation on who pays what depending on whether they are insured, the insurance company, or the hospital. OK, I can agree that we are all gaming the system. There are too many people who aren't able to pay today, but then the hospital over charges the patient and the insurance company to make up for those who aren't able to pay. The insurance company then limits the amount they will compensate and the amount that the covered patient is required to pay to compensate for the over charge. The people who get burned are the ones without insurance, who by the way are the ones who use the system because they can't pay.....really? How does this work? He's right. We are all getting screwed royally.
But my biggest gripe was that he expected to see the surgeon because he is a hospitalist and thinks that he is more deserving of seeing the doctor because he is one...really? Give me a break!